The Fourth Figure of Logic: The Need for Clarity in Debate and Argument.
There is a great deal of controversy in the study of logic and logic theory concerning the fourth figure of categorical syllogism, which is also often referred to as a "mood" for the study of logic. This paper explores the significance of the fourth figure in respect to its application within logic and logic theory, where the fourth figure is typically ignored because of its inherent confusion due to a general lack of clarity in formulation. A discussion of Aristotle's intentional exclusion of this fourth figure in the study of logic is examined in addition to the general discussion, where this paper shall argue that Aristotle disliked the use of the fourth figure because it was less clear than the other three major forms. 9 pgs. Bibliography lists 7 sources.
